HAPPY, HAPPY, HAPPY

It does not take a new high on the Dow Jones Industrial average to make me happy, but it sure does not hurt. After talking about the mid cycle turn for more than a year, I look forward to changing the main topic of these missives. The mid cycle turn will soon be talked about in the past tense.

In 1969,with the Vietnam war was staring me in the face, I got a firsthand perspective of a "scarce resource economy." President Johnson had practiced the strategy of "guns and butter" and the central bank went along with his attempt to have super prosperity while fighting the war with one hand tied behind his back. Then Nixon and Ford fought the ensuing inflation wars with silly price controls. Many people who remember the "Whip Inflation Now" buttons of the Ford administration do not recall that Nixon also tried to use government mandates to hold down prices. Jimmy Carter gave up the fight and by 1980 the markets had witnessed 11 years of commodity markets offering a greater return than offered by the stock market.

The new head of the FOMC, Paul Volcker deserves much of the credit for "Whipping Inflation." Ronald Reagan should get the rest of the credit. President Reagan and Paul Volcker were willing to make the hard choices necessary.

The war in Iraq is a back yard brawl relative to the Vietnam War. Some 56,000 Americans died in Vietnam compared to some 3,800 in Iraq. Human life is most precious but the facts are still the facts. While there are parallels between the 1969 to 1980 time and today's markets, the prior period did not include the benefits of globalization and technological advance that we have today. Indeed, while it was Nixon who broke the ice with China, in or around 1972, the economic revolution in China and the rest of the under developed world has all happened during the past 20 years.

This commodity cycle is only seven years old. When the 1969 to 1980 cycle turned, it turned sharply. To date, this turn has been a slow turn and one that few have even noticed. With oil and gold sitting near all time high nominal prices, many market followers would laugh at me for saying that the turn is under way, but it is. One can see the turn by looking at the broad CRB index but the best place to see the turn is in the stock market. There has been a decisive turn in the market; growth is out performing value and this did not start yesterday. Indeed, growth has out performed value since July. If you plot the IVW index versus the IVE index you will see what I am talking about. Or you can simply look at a long term chart of the NASDAQ 100! This index has broken through resistance that goes all the way back to 2002, before 9/11/2001.

YES, I AM HAPPY, HAPPY, HAPPY. I HOPE YOU ARE TOO. THE PENDING DECISIONS OF CONGRESS SEEM TO BE HANGING OVER OUR HEADS LIKE THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES BUT I BELIEVE THIS IS ONLY A LAYER ON THE WALL OF WORRY THAT WILL BE CLIMBED! IT WILL NOT BE A SMOOTH CLIMB SO HANG ON TO YOUR HATS AND TO THE SADDLE HORN AT THE SAME TIME!

FOLLOW UP TO GOVERNMENT FUNDING

My statement that the government has more than enough revenue has been challenged. I stand by my belief while offering only a few statements in support of my position. When Art Laffer defends the Laffer curve, he evokes the memory of the 14th century Muslim Philosopher, Ibn Khadun, who wrote "at the beginning of the dynasty, taxation yields a small revenue from small assessments, at the end of the dynasty, taxation yields a small revenue from large assessments." I look at it this way, if your goal is to end prosperity then tax it to death. People are willing to pay very high taxes to "insure the common good" but today there is little that the government can offer to do inefficiently that private enterprise cannot do more efficiently.

The current situation is that government revenues are better than 18.5% of GNP which is higher than average. This has been accomplished with lower tax rates. If the US were to lower corporate rates, as so many other countries have done, jobs and investment in the USA would grow. Citizens need to remember that politicians must "fix problems" in order to collect campaign contributions. We must also appreciate that the politicians are "too smart to fix all the problems." Indeed, to really do well financially, they must create problems that will need to be fixed later. A king for a day could fix the AMT, immigration reform, healthcare reform and energy reform. Democracy has proven to offer longer term stability precisely because we must "muddle through", reach broad consensus and fix our problems slowly. In the process, we must always remember that whenever possible, problems should be fixed by private enterprise solutions. The healthcare system should not be a system of lobby fighting lobbies and more lobbies. A good system would be one in which the patient and the doctor decides what care is worthwhile.

I have not verified the following but it sounds like truth. A Canadian claims that the current waiting list for a human to have a hip replacement is three years long. He says that the waiting time for a dog, not covered under the government system is one week.

THANKS FOR THE REMINDER

I left out traffic congestion as one of the externalities of one person per car. Again, I do not agree that car owners should be forced out of their cars and into multi-passenger vehicles. If the tax on fuel is set to include the real total costs, individual decisions will work together as a market to find the best solutions.

BUY, BUY, BUY!